Kresna Social Science and Humanities Research
Full Lenght Article
The Influence of OCB (Organizational Citizenship Behavior) on The Lecturer's Organizational Pride (A Study at University of Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya)
Received 18 February 2021, Published 13 February 2021
Abstract
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) owned by a person as an organization member is an extra role behavior, formed when a person feels the benefits of the organization for himself. People become committed, loyal to behave outside the obligation, as an inseparable part of the organization. OCB appears to employees who commit, positive perception of the organization, feel satisfaction if giving something exceeds the standard (Borman & Motowidlo, 1993).
Someone behaves extra role, will do anything for the organization voluntarily and happily. Growing love, having all your heart, desperately defending his organization, is a form of Organizational Pride. Pride relates to feelings of commitment, intention, behavior, and shows cooperation with the organization (loyalty, staying as a member of the organization) (Tyler & Blader, 2000). -tulisan merah belum di translate-. The research aims to prove the influence of OCB on the Lecturer's Organizational Pride.
Explanatory observational research with cross-sectional approach. Respondents were 105 lecturers. The independent variable is OCB (Altruism, Conscientiousness, Sportsmanship, Courtesy, Civic virtue). The dependent variable is Organizational Pride. Data analysis using linear regression test, α = 0,05.
The results of the study prove that OCB influences Organizational Pride (p = 0.001; b = 0.573). It shows that OCB has a role in encouraging Lecturer Organization Pride.
The conclusion is that the higher the OCB will ultimately increase the Organizational Pride. Necessary activities to maintain and improve OCB and pride owned by lecturers (individual or institutionalized) sustainable, continuous training methods Small Group Discussion. Thus, strengthening the internalization of love, belongingness, commitment and loyalty to the organization. In the end it is able to optimize the performance of lecturer tridharma.
Keywords
Declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author (s) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
2. Boezeman, E. & Ellemers, 2008. Pride and respect in volunteers organizational commitment. European Journal of Social Psychology, Volume 38, pp. 159-172.
3. Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J., 1993. Expanding The Criterion Domain to. Include Elementsof Extra-Role Performance.. NewJersey: Prentice-Hall.
4. Hobfoll, S. E., 1989. Conservation of resources: A New attempt at conceptualing stress. American Psychology, Volume 44, pp. 513-524.
5. Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R. & Matteson, M. T., 2007. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
6. Organ , D. W., Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B., 2006. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecendents, and Consequnces. United Stated of America: Sage Publication, Inc.
7. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G., 2000. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management, 26(3), pp. 513-363
8. Katzenbach, J. R., 2003. Pride: a strategic asset. Journal of Strategy & Leadership , 31(5), pp. 34-38.
9. Kupprlwieser, V. G., Grefrath, R. & Dziuk, A., 2011. A Classification of Brand Pride Using Trust and Commitment. Journal of Business and Social, 2(3).
10. Nadatien, Ima (2018), Pengaruh Nilai Bersama NU, Kebanggaan Organisasi, Perilaku Kewargaan Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Dosen di Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Disertasi, Surabaya, Universitas Airlangga
11. Singarimbun, M., 1994. Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta : LPS3ES.
12. Suharjo, B., 2008. Analisis Regresi Terapan SPSS. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu
13. Tracy, J. L. & Robins, R. W., 2007. The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), pp. 506-525.
14. Trihendradi, C., 2007. SPSS 13: Step by step Analisis Data Statistik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
15. Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L., 2000. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, andbehavior Engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16. Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L., 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Volume 7, pp. 349-361.
17. Volker G. Kuppelwieser, Robert Grefrath, Agathe Dziuk, a University of Wuppertal, Schumpeter Business School, Chair of Retail and Service Management, Gaussstr. 20, 42097 Wuppertal. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 3 [Special Issue January2011],www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol../3
18. Zurasaka, A., 2008. Teori Perilaku Organisasi. [Online] Available at: http://www.zurasaka.wordpress.com [Diakses 25 January 2016].
Copyright and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Information
-
Submitted
18 February 2021 -
Revised
18 October 2021 -
Published
13 February 2021