Kresna Social Science and Humanities Research
Full Lenght Article
Legitimacy and Authority in Medieval Islamic Historiography
Abstract
Usurpation is a common term used by Western historians to describe the illegitimate change of political supremacy in
the context of medieval Muslim states. The taking over of any state without authority is considered an illegal occupation
of a legitimate state and its leader is considered illegitimate or usurper. This paper attempts to shed some lights on the
notion of political legitimacy and authority in Islamic tradition and its application in the context of medieval Syria,
particularly during the Zengid dynasty. This period experienced the coming of the second crusade to the East with the
revitalization of the spirit of jihad was on its way among the Syrian Muslims. This paper argues that the Zengid dynasty
was trying to uphold the institution of the caliphate through recognizing the spiritual leadership of the ‘Abbasid caliph
of Baghdad as well as acquiring political legitimacy to administer their subject on behalf of the caliph and the Seljuq
sultan. Through adherence to the Sunni tradition of political legitimacy, Zengi (d. 541/1146) and Nur al-Din (d.
569/1174) succeeded in promoting Sunnism by means of Muslim unity and jihad enterprise. As a result, after the
annexation of Egypt from the Fatimid caliphate in 565/1171, Muslims in Syria and Egypt were unified under the banner
of Sunnism with Nur al-Din as their new legitimate ruler
Keywords
Declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author (s) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
[2] Moosa, Matti. Crusades: Conflict between Christendom and Islam. New Jersey: Gorgias Press; 2008. pp. 55-56.
[3] Humpreys, R. S. The Jihad and Its Times. Michigan: Mpublishing; 2011. Legitimacy and Instability in Islam in the Age of the Crusades; pp. 5-6.
[4] Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations. Illinois: The Free Press; 1947. p. 328
[5] Schneidmüller, Bernd. Rule by Consensus: Forms and Concepts of Political Order in the European Middle Ages.
The Medieval History Journal. 2013; 16(2): pp. 449-471.
[6] Khan, M.Y. A Political Study of al-Mawardi with Special Reference to the Concept of Legitimacy; PhD Disserta
tion, University of Leeds. 2001. pp. 176-177.
[7] Bouzenita, Anke Iman. Early Contributions to the Theory of Islamic Governance: ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Awza‘i. Journal of Islamic Studies. 2012; 23(2): p. 164.
[8] Khan, M.Y. A Political Study of al-Mawardi with Special Reference to the Concept of Legitimacy; PhD Disserta tion, University of Leeds. 2001. P. 143.
[9] Hallaq, W. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 208.
[10] Al-‘Asqalani, Ibn Hajar. Fath al-Bari bi Syarh Sahih al-Bukhari. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah; 1959. v. 13, p. 319; Al-Khattabi. Ma‘alim al-Sunan. Halab: al-Matba‘ah al-‘Ilmiyyah; 1932. v. 4, p. 160; Al-Nawawi. al-Minhaj
Syarh Sahih Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi; 1972. v. 12, p. 13.
[11] Humpreys, R. S. The Jihad and Its Times. Michigan: Mpublishing; 2011. Legitimacy and Instability in Islam in
the Age of the Crusades; pp. 6.
[12] Ibn al-Athīr. Al-Tarikh al-Bahir fi al-Dawlah al-Atabikiyyah bi al-Mawsil. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Hadithah; 1963. p. 13.
[13] Al-Khudarī, Muhammad. al-Dawlah al-‘Abbāsiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Qalam; 1986. pp. 483-484.
[14] Ibn al-Athīr. Al-Tarikh al-Bahir fi al-Dawlah al-Atabikiyyah bi al-Mawsil. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Hadithah; 1963. pp. 13-14.
[15] Ibn al-Athīr. Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh. Beirut: Dar Beirut; 1982. p. 493.
[16] Ibn al-Athīr. Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh. Beirut: Dar Beirut; 1982. p. 493.
[17] Ibn Kathir. Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah; 1997. pp. 146-147.
[18] Ibn al-Athīr. Al-Tarikh al-Bahir fi al-Dawlah al-Atabikiyyah bi al-Mawsil. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Hadithah; 1963. pp. 34-35.
[19] Ibn Kathir. Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah; 1997. p. 231.
Copyright and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Information
-
Submitted
18 February 2021 -
Revised
18 October 2021 -
Published
12 February 2021