Decision Making System Determination of assistance Home renovation With Weight product and simplle additive weighting

Home used for shelter, .[1][2] communities don’t have home, its because poverty factor. .[3] The government has a program that can eradicate poverty, one of which is a home renovation program. Data obtained from about poverty rate in Lampung province amounted to 13.01% in September 2018, [4] This Program is given to residents according to the criteria specified. Currently A home renovation program is still subjective, This research uses the method WP and saw There are 11 criteria , it needs to solve this problem. They are Work, land Status of residence, Wall house, drinking water source, fuel for cooking, MCK Condition, consumption (meat, milk, chicken) per year, highest education of family head, family head income, roof structure, floor type


Introduction
The house is a place of residence and family gathering place [1] Because of poverty factor, They are hard to get a habitable home[2] Especially happened in North Lampung. Data from bps in Lampung province amounted 13.01% in September, And in March 2018 by 13.14% [3]. Based on the above data, the percentage increased. Government has several programs, it is home renovation[4]The Program is given to the poor, Communities in North Lampung, This program is provided in cash, Then this money will be bought in the tool building tools. It aims to avoid misuse of aid funds. The program is given to the community, with certain criteria and conditions. However, in fact, the selection of beneficiaries is still subjective. Not only that,,,but also any problem at this program, they are Limited amount of funds. Based on the problems above, a decision-making system is required. It is necessary to help determine the recipients of the most appropriate funding.not onli that but also this program need some criteria, they are Work, land Status of residence, Wall house, drinking water source, fuel for cooking, MCK Condition, consumption (meat, milk, chicken) per year, highest education of family head, family head income, roof structure, floor type.
For the above problem, Researchers use two methods, they are weight product ( WP) dan Simple additive weighting(SAW) [5]. These two methods are useful for getting the best results. These two methods are used for previous research. This is because both of these methods have a good selectivity. This method also includes the objectives of the criteria, not only benefit criteria but also cost criteria[6], finaly, with both these methods, We can know the best results, not only that but also we can accommodate aid on targe 2/6

Decision Making System
Fuzzy set theory is an appropriate tool which uses the natural language that humans use to control complex systems such as Home Renovation Program[7] Decision making consideres a dicision as a specific information processing process.it studies the cognitive processes that lead to decisions and the way information is processed in these processes. [8].
The traditional DSS "dialogdata -model " architecture (sparage and waston 1997), limits communication between the system's components communications with external system's components and also the components, communication with external systems in ways independent of any pre-specified control mechanism ( Kresten and Noronha 1999 ). A major problem with this architecture is that it does not have plug-and-play philosophy[9] SPK is aimed at decisions that require assessment[8], SPK can be interpreted as a computer-based system consisting of three main components that interact with each other's language system (communication between users and other SPK components) Knowledge system (Domain knowledge Repository, procedure) and problem processing system (relationship between two other components[8]

The House
The house is a building that serves as a residence or residential and family coaching facilities [2] In previous studies the use of Saw method was used for the selection of ideal housing location by Erwin Panggabean[9]

Weighted Product method
Weighted Product method uses the multiplication indicator to link the rating of the attribute, where the rating of each attribute should be first rounded with the weight of the corresponding attribute. This process is similar to the normalization process. The preference for alternatives is given as follows [10]

Simple Additive Wighting (SAW)
This method is a method with a weighted summation, the basic concept of the SAW method is to look for the weighted summation of the performance rating of each alternative on all attributes. Ni Didasarankan method to solve problems in multi process decision making [10] This method is widely used in decision making process with many criteria or attributes, this method requires the process of normalizing decision Matrix (x) to a scale that can be compared with all existing alternative rating.

Conclusions and results
The highest score is the head of the family who is most deserving of the Raskin and the lowest value is the unworthy value of getting Raskin Based on observations using the method WP and SAW by doing the weighted, we see that both methods have similarities in the process, but these two methods result in an error value and then deduced the best results (SAW 0.070137683 )